Research as Inquiry
An investigation of the social networking behaviour of grade 9 high school
learners at john ramsay senior secondary school.
Learning Outcomes;
1) Learners will have intellectual curiosity in developing questions and
learning new investigative methods.
2) Learners will understand where to go to look for appropriate or relevant
help
3) Learners will be able to do introspection and uncover their poor social networking
activities and he given the tools to improve it.
Activity 1: Seek divergent perspectives during information gathering and
assessment. In this activity learners will explore the various ways in which a
person can investigate. They will also via means of proper research conduct
interviews, questionnaires, etc. So divided into groups each group will go on
school computers with internet access and go on sites with information varying
research methods. Knowledge Practice: Use a variety of research methods, based on
need, circumstance, and type of inquiry
Activity 2): Learners will be given 30 minutes to draw a concept map
stemming from the topic and discuss their findings. By creating or drawing this
concept map learners will be exposed to finding new ways to search for
information, eg. Different concepts may assist in broadening search strategies
for a particular topic. A concept map for laptops might bring up notebooks and
so allow a researcher to look up information on notebooks or various other
synonyms. Knowledge Practice: Deal with complex research by breaking
complex questions into simple ones, limiting the scope of investigation,
conducting a series of investigations, and performing subsequent steps.
Activity 3): Learners will do 30 minutes of research on the topic of Social
Networking, Social Networks, its origins, and how it was initially aimed to be
used for and see the gap between its purpose and how they use it. And cite 3
different media sources. Knowledge
practices: synthesize ideas gathered from
multiple sources, use research appropriately to make decisions and take action,
practice self-reflection and meta-cognition.
Sunday, August 23, 2015
Wednesday, August 19, 2015
Information Literacy 'Research as Inquiry
The frame ‘Research as inquiry’ focuses or mainly surrounds
the notion that there must always be questions asked. Questions form the main
part of research, there can never be research, or new work done if there isn’t
a question or questions. And constantly asking questions relates to inquiry
based learning.
In this class I learned that research is iterative (a process of back and forth).
This means basically that research or asking questions leading to research is
basically a process of going back and forth. Eg. A friend says to you ‘tap
water that we drink in South Africa is unsafe or unhygienic to drink’. Being an
academic, or having an inquisitive mind you don’t just take things at face
value and decide to do a bit of research on this topic. Let’s say for interest
sake (This is just an example I haven’t done research to either support or
disprove this phenomenon) that this is false but research uncovers that this is
taking place in other places and one decides to investigate this and ask why
isn’t anything being done by the governing body of that state. And this leads
to political reasons as to why and why not and this takes us to economics and
so on.
Experts
recognise the collaborative effort within a discipline to extend the knowledge
in that field. Many times this process includes points of disagreement where
debate and dialogue work to deepen the conversations around knowledge. And as
such one discipline learns or implements concepts or ideas from another
discipline to broaden the depth of that discipline.
It extends
beyond the academic world; it’s not just people holding high end degrees but
also the lay person. People who have personal needs, or individuals trying to
solve a community problem. An example of
a societal need that was seen is The Rylands-Gatesville Civic Association that
was successfully launched this year, it was started to try and help with the
fight against gangsterism, robberies, drugs and so forth. A societal need
observed over a long period and someone (Sataar Parker) took the initiative to
do something about it.
The frame
deals also with the way a research questions are structured or formed in order
to get answers. And it deals with identifying and finding the gaps in
knowledge.
This frame
explains or basically tells us that gaining new knowledge leads to asking new
questions. And so it ends with the example that I gave earlier where the one
friend tells the other friend about the impurities of tap water in South Africa
and that leading to research and then new questions are formed and asked and
researched and so the process is repeated and repeated.
http://www.inspiredteaching.org/wp-content/uploads/impact-research-briefs-inquiry-based-teaching.pdf
http://www.inspiredteaching.org/wp-content/uploads/impact-research-briefs-inquiry-based-teaching.pdf
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Scholarship as Conversation Assignment
Choose a topic or research project
for your students (1)
Investigate if parents should be
allowed to censor literature in schools?
(This topic addresses current issues of
parents who find it offensive for various reasons for their children
to be exposed to content that they find isn't suitable for them.
Religious reasons in most cases are chief among them.)
Draft three learning outcomes (3)
After today’s class learners must be
able to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of parent
involvement.
Learners should be able to describe the
most common concerns regarding censorship
Learners should be able to tell the
difference between censorship/over-reacting/freedom of speech
(involves the right to learn all the information and form an
opinion).
Design three activities (3)
Activity 1: Give an oral account
on what was learned. (Learners are to go out and read up on
the topic of 'Censorship' and then present what they found to the
class Knowledge Practice: not having a fluency in
the language and process of a discipline dis-empowers their
ability to participate and engage.
So by knowing what censorship is about and what it is not would help
a person’s confidence when speaking about the concept.
Activity 2: Design a Role-playing
activity. In order to assist the kids in understanding the
concept or topic mentioned. We will have children acting as the
parents, and researching from various sources (parents and teachers)
and avenues from censorship as a parent perceives it. The Knowledge
practice that this represents is to critically evaluate contributions
made by others in participatory information environments. Show even
though these are learners they will have to look at contributions
made by various sources that write from the perspective of a mother
and add to that conversation.
Activity 3:
Third activity I would start a discussion forum for my class.
And on that platform they must discuss things from a student/parent
point of view. Openly discuss whether they agree or disagree or
agree and disagree and also they must motivate on this platform why
they feel what they feel and the validity of whatever they are
saying. Where they got their information from. Knowledge
Practice: contribute to scholarly conversation at an appropriate
level (local online community, guided discussion, undergraduate
research journal, conference presentation/poster session).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)